Home

AgnosticWeb.com

  • Log in
  • Register
  
New topic
  • Refresh
  • Order
  • Fold threads
  • Table view
 
[«]
[»]

Sidebar

Latest postings

  • A Christmas Carol
    307 days ago
  • David Turell has died
    333 days ago
  • David Turell has died
    423 days ago
  • David Turell has died
    424 days ago
  • David Turell, 11 April 1929 - 18 June 2025
    495 days ago
  • David Turell has died
    496 days ago
  • Human evolution: face of a Denisovan
    496 days ago
  • Human evolution: new age for White Sands foot prints
    496 days ago
  • Is punctuated equilibrium explained? David Turell 2010-02-12, 02:39 PM [*] (Introduction)
  • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-10, 10:20 PM [*] (Evolution)
    • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-17, 02:44 PM
      • Turns out Random is Better dhw 2010-02-17, 10:38 PM
        • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-18, 01:25 AM
          • Turns out Random is Better dhw 2010-02-20, 12:38 PM
            • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-20, 07:00 PM
            • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-20, 07:50 PM
              • Turns out Random is Better David Turell 2010-02-20, 10:01 PM
                • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-21, 05:38 PM
                  • Turns out Random is Better David Turell 2010-02-21, 08:53 PM
                    • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-21, 10:38 PM
                      • Turns out Random is Better David Turell 2010-02-22, 01:08 AM
                        • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-22, 10:59 PM
                          • Turns out Random is Better David Turell 2010-02-23, 01:11 AM
                            • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-23, 03:24 AM
                              • Turns out Random is Better David Turell 2010-02-23, 09:55 PM
              • Turns out Random is Better dhw 2010-02-21, 05:06 PM
                • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-21, 06:07 PM
                  • Turns out Random is Better dhw 2010-02-22, 02:14 PM
                    • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-24, 04:06 PM
                      • Turns out Random is Better dhw 2010-02-24, 11:10 PM
                        • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-25, 12:49 AM
                          • Turns out Random is Better dhw 2010-02-25, 06:27 PM
                • Turns out Random is Better David Turell 2010-02-21, 07:44 PM
                  • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-21, 10:51 PM
                    • Turns out Random is Better David Turell 2010-02-22, 12:45 AM
                      • Turns out Random is Better xeno6696 2010-02-22, 11:05 PM
  • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-10, 09:41 PM [*] (The limitations of science)
    • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math George Jelliss 2010-02-13, 09:28 PM
      • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-13, 11:00 PM
        • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math George Jelliss 2010-02-14, 12:51 PM
          • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-14, 04:48 PM
            • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math George Jelliss 2010-02-14, 11:48 PM
              • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-15, 03:19 AM
                • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math George Jelliss 2010-02-15, 07:34 PM
                  • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-15, 09:33 PM
                    • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math George Jelliss 2010-02-16, 06:12 PM
                      • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-16, 09:59 PM
                        • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math George Jelliss 2010-02-16, 11:39 PM
                          • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-17, 02:52 AM
                            • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-17, 02:30 PM
                              • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math George Jelliss 2010-02-17, 05:39 PM
                                • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-17, 06:42 PM
                                  • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math George Jelliss 2010-02-17, 09:44 PM
                                    • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-18, 01:12 AM
                                  • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math David Turell 2010-02-18, 06:01 AM
                                    • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-18, 11:53 AM
                                      • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math George Jelliss 2010-02-18, 12:29 PM
                                      • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math David Turell 2010-02-18, 01:58 PM
                          • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-17, 03:11 AM
                          • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-17, 04:00 AM
      • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-02-25, 11:05 PM
        • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-02, 11:39 PM
          • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math David Turell 2010-03-02, 11:59 PM
            • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-03, 04:11 PM
              • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math David Turell 2010-03-03, 11:11 PM
                • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-04, 03:55 AM
              • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-04, 02:54 PM
                • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-06, 03:17 PM
                  • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-06, 10:20 PM
          • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-03, 03:35 PM
            • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-04, 02:45 PM
              • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-04, 10:23 PM
                • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-05, 09:40 PM
                  • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-06, 12:37 AM
                    • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-06, 10:07 PM
                      • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-07, 12:08 AM
                        • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-07, 10:43 PM
                          • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-08, 12:07 AM
                            • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-08, 08:01 PM
                              • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-10, 05:28 PM
                                • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math David Turell 2010-03-11, 01:17 AM
                                • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-12, 01:53 PM
                                  • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math xeno6696 2010-03-17, 12:27 AM
                                    • Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math dhw 2010-03-17, 08:57 PM
  • Thermal vents theory for origin of life David Turell 2010-02-08, 09:20 PM [*] (Introduction)
    • Thermal vents theory for origin of life xeno6696 2010-02-08, 11:37 PM
    • Thermal vents theory for origin of life David Turell 2010-02-27, 02:12 PM
  • How to avoid lost entries David Turell 2010-02-08, 04:50 PM [*] (Introduction)
    • How to avoid lost entries xeno6696 2010-02-09, 03:15 AM
      • How to avoid lost entries dhw 2010-02-09, 11:35 AM
  • Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots xeno6696 2010-02-01, 08:48 PM [*] (Introduction)
    • Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots dhw 2010-02-02, 12:25 PM
      • Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots xeno6696 2010-02-03, 03:36 AM
  • Language dhw 2010-01-28, 11:10 AM [*] (General)
    • Language xeno6696 2010-02-01, 12:28 PM
    • Language dhw 2010-02-02, 12:16 PM
      • Language xeno6696 2010-02-03, 03:30 AM
    • Language dhw 2010-02-03, 12:33 PM
  • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory David Turell 2010-01-26, 05:21 PM [*] (Introduction)
    • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory xeno6696 2010-02-01, 02:04 PM
      • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory David Turell 2010-02-01, 02:52 PM
        • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory xeno6696 2010-02-01, 03:55 PM
          • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory xeno6696 2010-02-01, 04:05 PM
          • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory David Turell 2010-02-02, 04:16 PM
            • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory George Jelliss 2010-04-03, 05:10 PM
              • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory David Turell 2010-04-04, 02:55 AM
              • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory dhw 2010-04-04, 01:51 PM
                • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory George Jelliss 2010-04-05, 06:29 PM
                  • How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory David Turell 2010-04-05, 08:05 PM
  • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-23, 02:43 PM [*] (Introduction)
    • Back to irreducible complexity xeno6696 2010-01-23, 05:17 PM
      • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-23, 07:28 PM
        • Back to irreducible complexity xeno6696 2010-01-23, 07:48 PM
        • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-26, 07:32 PM
          • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-27, 02:59 PM
            • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-28, 05:07 PM
              • Back to irreducible complexity dhw 2010-01-29, 05:25 PM
                • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-01-29, 05:31 PM
                  • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-01-30, 02:47 PM
                    • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-01-31, 11:54 AM
                      • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-01-31, 05:25 PM
                  • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-08, 02:51 AM
                    • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-08, 04:46 AM
                      • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-08, 01:00 PM
                        • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-08, 04:46 PM
                          • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-08, 11:33 PM
                            • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-09, 01:13 AM
                              • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-09, 01:37 AM
                              • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-09, 02:43 AM
                                • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-09, 04:42 PM
                        • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-09, 11:42 AM
                          • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-09, 11:57 AM
                          • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-10, 12:37 AM
                            • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-10, 02:04 PM
                              • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-10, 05:48 PM
                                • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-11, 11:02 AM
                                  • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-21, 08:49 PM
                                    • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-23, 09:35 AM
                                      • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-24, 12:19 AM
                    • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-08, 01:14 PM
                      • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-08, 11:17 PM
                        • Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-09, 01:01 AM
              • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-02, 02:52 PM
                • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-05, 11:33 PM
                  • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-06, 01:19 AM
    • Back to irreducible complexity xeno6696 2010-02-16, 11:43 AM
      • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-16, 02:52 PM
        • Back to irreducible complexity xeno6696 2010-02-17, 02:50 PM
          • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-18, 05:56 AM
            • Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-19, 07:13 PM
  • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-01-23, 02:36 PM [*] (Introduction)
    • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-01-23, 04:58 PM
      • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-01-23, 07:23 PM
        • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-01-23, 08:11 PM
    • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? dhw 2010-01-24, 11:45 AM
      • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-01-24, 02:46 PM
        • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? BBella 2010-01-24, 09:32 PM
          • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-01-25, 06:29 PM
            • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-01-26, 01:36 AM
              • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-01-30, 08:23 PM
                • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? dhw 2010-01-31, 11:41 AM
                  • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-03, 02:24 PM
                    • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? dhw 2010-02-05, 12:05 PM
                      • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-06, 08:28 PM
                      • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? dhw 2010-02-07, 02:52 PM
                        • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-07, 03:05 PM
                          • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-10, 03:02 PM
                            • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-10, 10:28 PM
                              • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-11, 02:43 PM
                                • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-13, 02:09 AM
                                  • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-13, 04:13 AM
                                    • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-13, 02:49 PM
                                      • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-13, 04:40 PM
                                        • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-13, 05:26 PM
                                          • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-13, 07:01 PM
                                            • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-14, 02:26 PM
                                              • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-14, 06:00 PM
                                                • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-14, 06:53 PM
                                                  • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-15, 03:26 AM
                                                    • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-15, 04:36 AM
                                                      • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-15, 04:59 AM
                                                        • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-15, 03:08 PM
                                    • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-15, 04:54 AM
                                      • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-15, 03:05 PM
                                        • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-15, 03:14 PM
                                        • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-15, 03:50 PM
                            • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? dhw 2010-02-11, 05:55 PM
                            • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-24, 01:54 AM
                              • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-24, 01:57 AM
                                • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-02-24, 04:20 PM
                                  • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-02-25, 01:55 PM
                                    • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? xeno6696 2010-03-05, 01:12 AM
                                      • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-03-05, 02:10 PM
                                        • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? David Turell 2010-03-14, 11:56 PM
    • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? 1975 David Turell 2011-02-18, 08:21 PM
      • Politics and science; is science being corrupted? 1975 George Jelliss 2011-10-23, 08:18 PM
  • «
  • 1
  • …
  • 166
  • 167
  • 168
  • 169
  • 170
  • …
  • 187
  • »
44557 Postings in 1867 Threads, 97 registered users, 1 users online (0 registered, 1 guests)
Forum time: 2026-10-28, 09:06 AM (UTC)
  • To top
  • Contact
powered by my little forum