I agree that the entire process should be transparent to the public, but I don't see *any* reason that the machine is so broken that it doesn't work. > > But it didn't work in climate science. How do you prove transparency is present?-If the system at large wasn't working the way it was supposed to, you wouldn't have any fodder for "climategate." The information is coming out, isn't it? As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing to be concerned about here.