Back to irreducible complexity

David,-Maybe I'm just arguing via ignorance, but I remember exaptation being a Gould idea, not a Darwin idea? (and what difference would it make?) What's the textbook view of exaptation?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"

Complete thread:

Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-23, 02:43 PM
- Back to irreducible complexity xeno6696 2010-01-23, 05:17 PM
  - Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-23, 07:28 PM
    - Back to irreducible complexity xeno6696 2010-01-23, 07:48 PM
    - Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-26, 07:32 PM
      - Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-27, 02:59 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-01-28, 05:07 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity dhw 2010-01-29, 05:25 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-01-29, 05:31 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-01-30, 02:47 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-01-31, 11:54 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-01-31, 05:25 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-08, 02:51 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-08, 04:46 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-08, 01:00 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-08, 04:46 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-08, 11:33 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-09, 01:13 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-09, 01:37 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-09, 02:43 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-09, 04:42 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-09, 11:42 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-09, 11:57 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-10, 12:37 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-10, 02:04 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-10, 05:48 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-11, 11:02 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-21, 08:49 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-23, 09:35 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-24, 12:19 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) dhw 2010-02-08, 01:14 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) xeno6696 2010-02-08, 11:17 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) David Turell 2010-02-09, 01:01 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-02, 02:52 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-05, 11:33 PM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-06, 01:19 AM
- Back to irreducible complexity xeno6696 2010-02-16, 11:43 AM
  - Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-16, 02:52 PM
    - Back to irreducible complexity xeno6696 2010-02-17, 02:50 PM
      - Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-18, 05:56 AM
        
        Back to irreducible complexity David Turell 2010-02-19, 07:13 PM

AgnosticWeb.com

Back to irreducible complexity (Introduction)