I don't have absolute proof of God. No one can. What I use is Adler's proof beyond a reasonable doubt approach. I find the scientific evidence I have reviewed to overwhelming point to the existence of a greater power, presuming that the generally accepted findings are correct, but my mind will change if those scientific theories are modified enough. I go with the evidence as I see it.-I did not ask whether you had absolute proof of god. Do you have proof of god? And if so how is this proof different from evidence for god?-Adler's proof - what are his axioms? Are they reasonable? What are the weaknesses of his arguments?-And yet I find your general musings insufficient to come to a conclusion regarding a panentheistic god. So your proof is entirely personal?-Anyway ... your use of proof is remains equivalent of evidence.-And any proof that has an argument form incredulity in it is not a proof in my book.