DAVID: They can't. At some point it is faith from the evidence we have. > > dhw: If your conclusions cannot be based on experiments, how can you claim that they are based on experimental evidence? Your faith is the result of your speculations about the possible shape of the unobservable world, and you have designed an explanation that cannot be tested.-I follow Adler. I have enough evidence to feel beyond a reasonable doubt God exists. I reached a point where I took Pascal's leap. That point is the complexity of biochemical functions to create life. I understand you can't take the leap, but I wonder if it is due to your insufficient understanding of that complexity, which is why I keep presenting it. But it may be that you seem to demand proof of everything, which is not possible.