Glad you are back. Just passing through David, but thanks.-You did not answer rom's little known question David.- > Krauss has been refuted over and over as noted here. How do you get something from a true nothing? Which is Krauss' mistake. He starts with quantum virtual particles, if my memory is correct, and that is not nothing. Nothing is an absence of anything, a true void. Adding up charges to equal zero also in not nothing.-This is not Krauss's central argument ... that charges balance!