dhw: I challenge the view that advances ALWAYS result from loss of genes! I suggest that bbbthe process is on-going, with a constant acquisition of new genes (or new functions for old genes) and loss of unwanted genes. Natural selection merely decides which genes are necessary and which are not.

DAVID: Natural selection has nothing to do with genes directly!!! You are challenging two sources of advances in form and function through the gene loss concept: Behe's book, filled with examples and an article that lists many studies but never mentions Behe's ideas. How can you challenge it? From previous bias is obvious.

dhw: What do you mean by “directly”? If certain genes are no longer required, it is perfectly “natural” that they should disappear. I am puzzled by the theory you have presented, so instead of asking why I challenge it, perhaps you would enlighten me by explaining why my bolded proposal above is impossible.

DAVID: Your proposal is wishful, but not supported by anything in the article I presented or by Behe's book. Facts are facts. DNA Loss is now known and supported by a source (quoting multiple studies other than Behe). The last of Darwin worship is dying.

I have acknowledged DNA loss! Please forget your hatred of Darwin and your love of Behe and explain to me why my bolded proposal is not feasible.