DAVID's comment: Most junk DNA is not junk but purposeful. There are Darwinist scientists who are frightened by these findings, since in their minds a random theory of mutations should produce 'junk'. If most DNA shows purposeful activity, it is highly suggestive of design.

dhw: As I have said before, I don’t know why they should be frightened. One would expect natural selection to dispose of ”junk”.

Again, the theory has been chance mutations produced useless DNA which was kept as evolution swept along as living proof only chance mutations apply to the theory. 'Nuff said