To describe Zara as an "acolyte" of Dawkins is pejorative. > > He is an independent scientist. Here's his blog: > > http://blogs.parkplatz.net/steve/2009/09/26/1253924520000.html > > Some interesting thoughts on "fine tuning".-If he is a physicist, then he depends on Dawkins for biologic interpretation, and he sounded just like an acolyte in his comment, for he swallowed what is patently not true. The evidence shows he, as an 'independent scientist' is not thinking for himself. His fine tuning analysis takes Conway Morris to task for his theism, and sounds like the pure atheist analysis one should expect. I can match him on the other side with Gerald Schroeder, whose latest book is "God According to God, A Physicist Proves We've Been Wrong About God", 2009.