Evidence for pattern development; Golden Ratio (Introduction)
Romansh: David you avoided my question? > I don't think so.-Then humour me please David, because I have no solid idea whether you think you could be wrong.-But as you have dropped the agnostic moniker I suspect you think there is not any chance that you might be wrong. Plus you have gone to the effort of writing a book about your position.-I have no problem admitting I could be wrong. At the very, very best I would be incomplete.