A well thought out commentary on fine-tuning, multiverses,and cosmologic natural selection, which takes an atheistic side, but raises philosophic issues that suggest atheism is not the answer: > > > > > > >> http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2014/06/10/the-logic-and-beauty-of-cosmo... > > > > > > Interesting, but I don't quite see a philosophical atheism problem here. > > > > I see no reason to extend what we know about evoulution to universal scales. They do it with math that has no observational evidence. At least multi universe evolution has some evidence. It aint much, but it is ten fold more than even "inflation". > > > > silly math guys. thinking the equation of a human is the answer. Reminds me of a bible thumper. With less adjectives of course. > > If you had a coherent reason not to extend the concept of evolution to cosmological phenomena then I would take your criticism a little more seriously. > > Before 1923 we had no evidence of other galaxies either.- I can't, I don't agree with what I typed.-I meant ... "I see no reason "NOT" to .." but you knew that.