Dawkins dissed again and again (Introduction)
We are way off base. The Bible is the Bible. Neither of you are competent interpreters. It says they disobeyed. They lost their inocense. What has that got to do with agnostocism?
We are way off base. The Bible is the Bible. Neither of you are competent interpreters. It says they disobeyed. They lost their inocense. What has that got to do with agnostocism?
Complete thread: