Romansh: That is why I put it as I did. Thought may result from neural energy, but the thought itself is without any energy component in it. That is why consciousness is so tough to explain. > > You keep saying this David ... i have no way of verifying this statement. > > So you think there is possibility that an idea or thought contains energy, if spoken, voiced, or written? The energy is in the production, not the resultant thought itself. > -You keep saying this David ... I have no way of verifying this statement.-Why can't thought be energy?-Why this continual dualistic mindset ... thought separate from matter, god separate from matter?