Quantum theory: accepting a conjecture

Accepted but not proven:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=proof-found-for-unifying-quantum&W...

It appears to be a reasonable unification. Note the comment comparing how differently mathematicians and physicists view math proofs.

Actually, in the article, I don't see a strong difference made in dealing with mathematical vs. theoretical physics proofs... could you cue me in on the line?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"

Complete thread:

Quantum theory: accepting a conjecture David Turell 2011-11-15, 03:00 PM
- Quantum theory: accepting a conjecture xeno6696 2011-11-16, 02:32 AM
  - Quantum theory: accepting a conjecture David Turell 2011-11-16, 05:09 AM
    - Quantum theory: accepting a conjecture xeno6696 2011-11-16, 11:18 AM
      - Quantum theory: wave function is real, not statistical David Turell 2011-11-20, 01:27 AM
        
        Quantum theory: wave function is real, not statistical xeno6696 2011-11-21, 12:03 PM
        
        Quantum theory: his cat is back! David Turell 2011-11-29, 02:38 AM
        
        Quantum theory: Niels Bohr David Turell 2013-07-10, 02:27 PM
        
        Quantum theory: Niels Bohr dhw 2013-07-13, 11:32 AM
        
        Quantum theory: Niels Bohr David Turell 2013-07-13, 01:41 PM
        
        Quantum theory: Niels Bohr BBella 2013-07-13, 05:18 PM
        
        Quantum theory: Niels Bohr David Turell 2013-07-13, 08:34 PM
- Quantum theory: accepting a conjecture xeno6696 2011-11-16, 03:46 AM

AgnosticWeb.com

Quantum theory: accepting a conjecture (Introduction)