An article discussing calculating probabilites for mutations, evolution, etc. Pagliucci's objections are given. It is a clear presentation:- http://scienceblogs.com/evolutionblog/2011/08/probability_and_evolution.php?utm_source=... here is an answer from an ID author. Id folks like to use probability calculations as a way to refute Darwin's concept of evolution.-http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/evolution-and-probabilities-a-response-to-jason-rosenhouse/-From my own standpoint, after many discussions with Matt re math considerations for probability calculations, I prefer to look at complexity. And not just the argument about irreducible complexity. I'll shortly discuss James Shapiro's book, 'Evolution', as I finish it, but the complexities he describes change the paradigm of Neo-Darwinism completely. Life's processes, and control feedbacks are so inter-twined that a blind searching mechanism which is finally mediated by natural selection does not seem capable of such a creation.