Computing with DNA (Introduction)

by xeno6696, Sonoran Desert, (5637 days ago)

And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA.-http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-method-for-dna-computation-in-new-book.html

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"

locked
2998 views

Computing with DNA

by David Turell, (5635 days ago) @ xeno6696

And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA. > > http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-meth... is amazing stuff. It is a digital code, differing from 0&1 codes. But how much is 'junk' and what does that prove. Moran is debating the validity of the statements in Jonathan Wells' book, The Myth of Junk DNA.-http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/ today

locked
2960 views

Computing with DNA

by xeno6696, Sonoran Desert, (5634 days ago) @ David Turell

And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA. > > > > http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-meth... > > DNA is amazing stuff. It is a digital code, differing from 0&1 codes. But how much is 'junk' and what does that prove. Moran is debating the validity of the statements in Jonathan Wells' book, The Myth of Junk DNA. > > http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/ today-Clearly wasn't meant for me... "Junk" DNA I learned was a source of cell development and mediation functions. It was only junk from the perspective of the Central Dogma.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"

locked
3094 views

Computing with DNA

by David Turell, (5634 days ago) @ xeno6696

And I mean that literally. We now have the ability to write programs with DNA. > > > > > > http://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2011/05/16/nyu-researchers-outline-meth... > > > > DNA is amazing stuff. It is a digital code, differing from 0&1 codes. But how much is 'junk' and what does that prove. Moran is debating the validity of the statements in Jonathan Wells' book, The Myth of Junk DNA. > > > > http://sandwalk.blogspot.com/ today > > Clearly wasn't meant for me... "Junk" DNA I learned was a source of cell development and mediation functions. It was only junk from the perspective of the Central Dogma.-And here is a refutation of Moran:-http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2011/05/education-of-science-writer.html