Penrose disputes the standard model. He sees circles in the cosmic wave background and denies inflation occurred: > > > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/44388 > > > A review of Penrose, casting many doubts about his conclusions, which propose one Big Bang after another: > > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/indepth/44458-Now there is a second paper finding by statistical analysis "circles' that MAY represent one universe running into another. Of course the article itself has a headline that already concludes what is not proven. Why these review lay articles always headline more than is proven, in my view, is an attempt at sensationalism and a liberal science agenda against religion. Can't have one big bang. Looks too much like a creation.-http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-12-scientists-evidence-universes.html