Anyone who tries to argue in favour of the story of Noah's Fludde being a reality is not a skeptic but a propagandist for creationism. I hesitate to correspond with people who hide behind pen-names, but it seems to me that "Balance_Maintained" is just a "troll" who argues for the sake of stirring up argument where none is needed. Anyone who says of the truth: "In my experience, it is some where in the middle in just about any argument" is just a sophist not worthy of being taken seriously.