The article linked to by clicking on "non-intelligent design" is: > > http://www.pnas.org/content/107/suppl.2/8969 > > Which defines "intelligent design" in a very clear way, but not I suspect, one which DT will accept, since his God works in more mysterious ways, his wonders to disguise as accidents of evolution.-Everyone, please read this abstract. Avice presumes to know the 'best design' because he would not do it that way. We've seen this same approach before in the atheists claiming that the octopus eye is better than ours by looking at design, which is patently wrong when physiology is studied.