dhw: You have agreed that you cannot explain why your God would have “evolved” [= designed] us and our food supply by “evolving” [= designing] all those other unconnected life forms and food supplies if we were his only “goal”. But that is your belief. I must accept that you will not budge. I have presented my theistic alternatives which you have rejected. The discussion is over. So let’s leave it at that.

DAVID: Fine.

dhw: I’m going to ignore your earlier comments in this post, as what you have agreed to actually fills in the gaps created by those comments. Pax!

We agree to disagree.