David, > > Specifically the article is refuting the p of .00015 (ish) that I know you've referenced before. THAT is the weapon it takes away from you. You can no longer use it. -I don't know where or when I used a p value of any magnitude > > In either case, my overall point is that we can't trust statistical arguments for systems we don't completely understand.-But IF we understand, we can use them. Tell what is not understood.