Peer Review: shoddy publishing

Whew!-http://www.vox.com/2014/12/7/7339587/simpsons-science-paper-"A scientific study by Maggie Simpson, Edna Krabappel, and Kim Jong Fun has been accepted by two journals.-"Of course, none of these fictional characters actually wrote the paper, titled "Fuzzy, Homogeneous Configurations." Rather, it's a nonsensical text, submitted by engineer Alex Smolyanitsky in an effort to expose a pair of scientific journals  the Journal of Computational Intelligence and Electronic Systems and the comic sans-loving Aperito Journal of NanoScience Technology."

Complete thread:

Peer Review: latest review David Turell 2012-10-09, 01:56 PM
- Peer Review: another mess David Turell 2013-02-26, 02:42 PM
  - Peer Review: another mess David Turell 2013-05-30, 02:19 PM
    - Peer Review: another opinion David Turell 2013-06-25, 02:33 PM
      - Peer Review: another sting works David Turell 2013-10-04, 02:46 PM
        
        Peer Review: another sting works BBella 2013-10-04, 04:16 PM
        
        Peer Review: another sting works George Jelliss 2013-10-04, 04:49 PM
        
        The future of science publishing George Jelliss 2013-10-11, 11:08 PM
        
        The future of science publishing David Turell 2013-10-12, 01:10 AM
        
        Peer Review: another says bad David Turell 2013-10-15, 05:33 PM
        
        Peer Review: bad science David Turell 2013-10-20, 12:08 AM
        
        Peer Review: bad science David Turell 2013-11-22, 01:24 AM
        
        Peer Review: bad science George Jelliss 2014-02-25, 08:31 AM
        
        Peer Review: bad science David Turell 2014-02-25, 03:18 PM
        
        Peer Review: more fraud David Turell 2014-07-09, 12:55 AM
        
        Peer Review: good review David Turell 2014-09-28, 02:20 PM
        
        Peer Review: more study retractions David Turell 2014-12-10, 10:06 PM
        
        Peer Review: shoddy publishing David Turell 2014-12-17, 12:44 AM
        
        Peer Review: 2014 retraction review David Turell 2014-12-23, 02:39 PM
        
        Peer Review: Double blind reviews David Turell 2015-02-19, 03:07 PM
        
        Peer Review: More mess David Turell 2015-03-27, 10:08 PM
        
        Peer Review: More retractions David Turell 2015-08-18, 01:03 PM
- Peer Review: psycology studies mostly wrong David Turell 2015-09-01, 01:23 PM
  - Peer Review: psycology studies mostly wrong David Turell 2015-09-23, 04:28 AM
    - Peer Review: more bad press David Turell 2015-11-04, 12:40 AM
      - Peer Review: more bad press David Turell 2018-12-02, 09:50 PM
        
        Peer Review: more bad press dhw 2018-12-03, 02:35 PM
        
        Peer Review: predatory journals David Turell 2019-03-11, 12:37 AM
        
        Peer Review: predatory journals dhw 2019-03-11, 11:15 AM

AgnosticWeb.com

Peer Review: shoddy publishing (Introduction)