My book shows that science can offer strong proof of a greater power:-So I take it your book is not scientific in nature? I say this because science does not provide proof, strong or otherwise. What your book might do is provide corroborating evidence for a position or hypothesis. Or perhaps a disproof.-Now if your book is of a philosophical nature then proof might be a possibility. This assumes you have clear and well defined axioms and that the logic has been executed clearly.-6.9? I was never a fan of Dawkins' scale. I suppose it depends on whether we can be a little bit pregnant (have a little bit of free will)? Nevertheless Dawkins states quite clearly he cannot be certain.-I suspect like him I am 7 on the Greek, Roman, Norse and Abrahamic gods, though I suspect there might be some interesting insights gained on the human psyche from these myths.