The first commenter states:->Can "nothing" be unstable? Not by any scientific logic.->Absolute "nothingness" would be absolutely stable. To any sane natural philosopher it is a fairly ridiculous concept.-I completely disagree with this! How accurately can nothing be measured? To be an absolute nothing it has to be 0.00000000000... where there are an infinity of zeros. If there was a nonzero digit somewhere along the line it would not be nothing but something. Something, however small, is something. Nothing, to exist, has to be impossibly accurately defined.