It has been clear for some time that DNA study must take over from morphologically created evolutionary 'trees'. Two look alike worms are different species! http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090422121858.htm Also remember that hemoglobin, myoglobin, Cytochrome C and many other important ubiquitous common proteins show very little evidence of a 'tree'. I keep stating that I believe evoltion occurred, but as in 'punctuated equilibrium' of Gould and Eldridge, by sudden leaps, not itty bitty steps as Darwin proposed. Those leaps then do not produce tiny branching off appearances, and so-called trees become very discontinuous. - In a totally unrelated area of science, another quantum effect has been discovered, two atoms at a distance forming briefly a new form of molecular binding. http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2009/423/4 Per uncertainty, the electron is everywhere at the same time.