FREE WILL; DISSING LIBET (Introduction)
New findings doubt his approach:-http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22144-brain-might-not-stand-in-the-way-of-free-will.html
by David Turell, (5193 days ago)
New findings doubt his approach:-http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22144-brain-might-not-stand-in-the-way-of-free-will.html
by xeno6696, Sonoran Desert, (5193 days ago) @ David Turell
New findings doubt his approach: > > http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22144-brain-might-not-stand-in-the-way-of-free-wi... I said a couple weeks ago--and need to finish off with dhw--free will is not something I consider a valid question to ask anymore. Libet? Dennett? Decartes? Schopenhauer? -Wasted their time on that question.
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
by David Turell, (4728 days ago) @ xeno6696
More findings negate Libet:-http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24105593
by David Turell, (4495 days ago) @ David Turell
by David Turell, (4495 days ago) @ David Turell
Mistake. It is Tallis, not Nagel. My aging brain
by David Turell, (4468 days ago) @ David Turell
Research in ping pong. Yes there is a 200 millisecond delay, but the game is played and the brain areas coordinate relatively unconsciously:-http://medicalxpress.com/news/2014-08-brain-interact-cognitive.html