ROMANSH: The problem David [is] that Intelligent Design is really creationism. And whatever these two concepts are they are not science... > > DAVID: I look at some of their reasoning and it fits what I see as I study evolution. > > As I see it, these two statements cover two major areas of misunderstanding. Firstly, science is supposed to be neutral. The moment a scientist uses science to support a belief of any kind, whether theistic or atheistic, he leaves the realm of science behind. -An example of ID work, this time philosophy. Abiogenesis cannot spontaneously happen:-http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/on-the-impossibility-of-abiogenesis/-Try and pick apart the reasoning.