Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> > [b]Theodicy[/b]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Come on, free-will or free actions from God ALLOW evil, obviously byproduct.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: Free will ALLOWS what we call good and what we call evil.  Decent David decides to earn a living by becoming a doctor, and Dirty Dave decides to become a robber. Billy bacterium survives by doing things we consider nice, and Basil bacterium survives by doing things we consider nasty.  These are not “by-products of God’s good works” but products of autonomous decision-making! And since God does not dictate the decisions, clearly we have a free-for-all.
> 
> A side effect is the unintended result of any action. A byproduct is the same. Yours is a non-answer to the issue that God does not cause evil.
> > 
> > dhw: [i]Next comes yet another ridiculous response:[/i]
> > 
> > [b]Evolution[/b]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]I'm disagreeing with you. What is here in all the ecosystems that support us, is analyzed to show how evolution is a dispensary process, while achieving its results.[/i]
> > And:
> > DAVID: [i]When will you realize the statistics cover all of evolution in a generalized way, that the 0.1% CAME from the 99.9%. It does not consider specific lines.[/i]
> > [i]
> > dhw: When will you stop obfuscating? What do you mean by “came from” if you don’t mean “descended from”? Are you now denying that the history of evolution[/i] ["a dispensary process"] [i]is one of different species or “lines” or “branches” that have come and gone? 
> > [/i]
> > 
> > Not answered.
> 
> Of course we came from past ancestors. And so does every living thing on Earth. The survivors are 0.1% of all that ever lived. The 99.9% produced everything here now, humans and their food included.
> > 
> > Dhw: [i]….and you have ignored the dinosaur example, as you strive to distract attention from your belief that your God is a messy, cumbersome, inefficient designer. Please explain what other reason you can give for ridiculing him in this way?[/i]
> > 
> Explained: evolution is a cumbersome way to create.
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]I view God's evolution as messy. But as His choice it worked. We are here running the show.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: I asked you to explain your reasons for thinking it was messy and inefficient, not whether you did. The fact that we are here running (and trying hard to ruin) the show does not invalidate the theory that your God deliberately created a free-for-all! Raup attributes survival to “luck”. Or your God could have been experimenting with different life forms, or hit upon humans as one of many new ideas as he went along. Why do you insist that he deliberately, knowingly, messily, cumbersomely, inefficiently went on designing and culling irrelevant species although you also insist that he was perfectly capable of directly designing what he wanted? 
> 
> I  obviously have no answer as to why God used evolution to evolve us. I am convinced we ere His purpose.
> >  
> > [b]Cellular intelligence[/b]
> 
> > dhw: [i]Thank you for at last agreeing that your God might have designed autonomous cellular intelligence, instead of 3.8 billion years’ worth of preprogramming and ad hoc dabbling. […][/i]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]I agree with your description recognizing it is all automatic, no thought involved.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: [i]You have quoted my argument in bold above: that the code (perhaps God-given) might be the equivalent of a brain which acts autonomously, and you dare to pretend that a brain which independently processes, decides and instructs means a brain that does not independently process, decide and instruct. Next you will be telling me that the word “intelligent” means “without intelligence”. Please stop it.[/i]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]He coded DNA to give responses automatically.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: More obfuscation. If something harms us, of course we automatically try to escape from it or find a way of removing it. And so our intelligence leads us to processing the new information, communicating with others, taking decisions, giving instructions…You agreed with my description of this process, as applied to cells/cell communities, and now you pretend that autonomous intelligence means automatic obedience.
> 
> Not a pretense.