AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by dhw
Post reply
Reply to the message by
dhw
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> DAVID: [i]If sapiens fossils appear at the same ancient time all over Africa the savannah theory makes no sense. We can conclude various different populations of Erectus all over Africa evolved into Sapiens in the same time frames. This means pre-Erectus forms were also all over Africa, not just in savannahs.[/i] > > dhw: [i]There seems to be some controversy over whether erectus and sapiens overlapped, but we can certainly conclude that thousands of years ago different forms were all over Africa and not just in savannahs. That is not the point! You have twice emphasized that why and where and exactly when we evolved is “totally unknown”. bbbWe only know where and when sapiens was already alive and spreading himself around.bbb The savannah theory deals exclusively with the origin. What happened afterwards has nothing to do with the origin.[/i] > > DAVID: [i]The savannah theory was based on finding sapiens evidence solely in savannahs. Now that we have evidence of sapiens all over the place, the savannah theory loses its importance. What you want is a natural setting driving human evolution. But the settings now are everywhere. The human brain could handle all environmental problems. How did it evolve? Perhaps it was designed.[/i] > > The timing is all important, and we have absolutely no way of knowing where or when the first sapiens made their debut. Evidence of sapiens having spread all over the place provides us with no clue whatsoever to the ORIGIN of sapiens. All you are saying now is that we shouldn’t bother to discuss the possible origin. However, you have previously theorized that your God popped in one fine day and operated on some existing hominids to give them new legs and pelvises. Does the fact that sapiens spread to all parts of Africa invalidate your theory? Or are you now claiming that your God did a pan-African dabble?
OK - Submit
Preview