Post reply

Reply to the message by dhw

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> [b]LUCA[/b]
> 
> QUOTE: [i]The inferred age suggests that the process required [b]a surprisingly short interval of geologic time.[/b][/i]
> 
> DAVID: The striking point is [b]how quickly life appeared after the Earth formed[/b]. Strongly supports the concept of a designer at work.
> 
> dhw: [i]We have no criteria by which to judge what constitutes a short or a long period of formation, since the only formation of life we know about is our own! If your figures (and mine) are correct, it took 40,000,000 years for life to appear. Short in comparison to what?[/i]
> 
> DAVID: [i]In comparison to 13.78 billion years from the Big Bang. 40 million is the point of its appearance from an unknown time of its start. Your complaint is weird. The article is accepted science.[/i]
> 
> You just don’t or won’t see the point. Your 13.78 billion years are totally irrelevant, since I’m sure even you will agree that life cannot start on a planet that doesn’t exist. I am not disputing the accepted science. I am disputing your claim that 40 million years is a surprisingly short time (and therefore proof of design) for life to appear. You cannot know how long it normally takes for life to appear if the only example of life that you know of is ours. 
> 
> [b]T-cells help gut immunity[/b]
> 
> dhw:  […]  [i]I think there is still hope that you will also come round to the possibility that cells/cell communities have autonomous intelligence that enables them to make their own designs and decisions. After all, on the “balance of nature” thread, you have frequently accepted that our fellow creatures do have it (e.g. all birds except weavers), and we and they are all made of cell communities cooperating with other cell communities!
> DAVID: The cell communities are programmed to do that communication.[/i]
> 
> dhw: [i]What is the “programme”? One might say that they are “programmed” to communicate, just as we are: i.e. they were given the intelligence and means with which to communicate, but what they communicate and what decisions they take are the product of that autonomous intelligence. Or do you really believe they have all been programmed with every single message they give and receive, and with every decision they take in response to every situation they will meet for the whole history of life?[/i]
> 
> DAVID: [i]All cell reactions are programmed.[/i]
> 
> Just to confirm: you believe that, for instance, when a new virus attacks the immune system, your God either steps in personally to show the immune cells what to do, or 3.8 billion years ago he provided the first cells with a programme which all subsequent cells would automatically switch on, automatically choosing the correct response to the new virus – except of course when they fail to do so (i.e. when the new virus proves to be cleverer than God’s programme).