Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> Based on gravity effects:
> 
> https://www.sciencealert.com/time-ticks-faster-on-the-moon-now-we-know-precisely-how-much?utm_source=ScienceAlert+-+Daily+Email+Updates&utm_campaign=dd3109f629-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fe5632fb09-dd3109f629-366098385
> 
> "Since astronauts departed the lunar surface for the last time 52 years ago, time has ticked on by. Relative to us Earthlings, the Moon has pined for our return just a little longer – by roughly 1.1 seconds.
> 
> "It doesn't sound like much, and neither does the 57 millionths (0.0000575) of a second that the Moon's time stretches ahead compared to that of our home planet each day.
> 
> "But that crucial result of a new study from NASA scientists could be the difference between navigation systems syncing up as the US space agency launches its long-awaited crewed missions to the Moon and beyond.
> 
> "We've known about gravity's ability to slow time since Albert Einstein postulated his general theory of relativity. But the practicalities of measuring any temporal distortions that come with differences in gravity – such as the contrast between Earth's pull and the Moon's – have lagged far behind.
> 
> "Only in the last decade or so have we had atomic clocks sensitive enough to detect small differences in time between two objects moving relative to each other, or under different gravitational pulls.
> 
> "And with the half-century-long pause between crewed Moon landings, scientists didn't have a pressing reason to work out how those teensy time differences played out between Earth and our lunar companion. The Moon has one-sixth of Earth's gravity, but astronauts only stopped by briefly so it wasn't much of an issue.
> 
> ***
> 
> "This new finding helps in that regard, and has been in the works for some time. Slava Turyshev, a physicist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory who led the study, told O'Callaghan: "Somebody needed to sit down and work out the maths."
> 
> "From Earth, it appears as if the Moon has gained 57 millionths of a second per Earth day. Turyshev and colleagues came to this number by calculating the sliding scale of time for Earth and the Moon relative to the barycentre of the Solar System. This is the Solar System's common center of mass, around which the Sun, planets and satellites orbit in a delicate balance.
> 
> "Turyshev and colleagues' calculations come close to the 56.02 microseconds a different team of researchers from the US National Institute of Standards and Technology landed on in February. But tiny fractions of a second matter over such big distances, so there's still some work to do."
> 
> Comment:  amazing what the human brain can do. Develop ways to measure tiny bits of time after realizing how important it is for long lunar visits or longer space travels. This shows my point clearly. Our brain is much too big and complicated for the single purpose of survival. Darwin's emphasis on adaptions for survival driving evolution does not fit this example. In short, human beings cannot be explained by Darwin's theory of evolution.