Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> > DAVID: [i]We know different bacteria in a biofilm do different functions based on their placement, but that is probably fully automatic, not bacterial knowing choice.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: If they perform different functions within their community, and we know they communicate, how can you say they don't cooperate? You are now merely repeating your belief that their cooperation and communication were "probably" preprogrammed 3.8 billion years ago.
> 
> If they are programmed to cooperate of course that is  what happens. You want them to independently act.
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Once again you have cells designing with purpose with no evidence of how they might have thought.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: As usual you try to switch the argument. First it’s purpose and design, and when I answer that, you resort to the fact that we don’t know the source of thought. (See below.)
> > 
> > DAVID: [..] [i]You can postulate cell intelligence, but can't tell me where it came from. Intelligence requires Thinking and a mind.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: [i]Nobody can tell us where life came from, and no believer can tell us where his God came from. That is why we theorize. The fact that you believe God exists, and that he provided the first cells with programmes for every single undabbled life form, econiche etc. does not in any way invalidate the postulation of cellular intelligence. I agree that intelligence requires a form of thinking, but that does not mean the cell has to have a brain like ours.[/i]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Please tell us which organelle in a cell can possibly plan with thought?[/i]
> > 
> >  dhw:  If we knew that, there would be no debate. Please tell us which organelle in a cell contains the 3.8-billion-year-old computer programme for every single action that it will ever perform.
> 
> Simple. The genome.