Post reply

Reply to the message by Frank Paris

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> "Before the rise of consciousness in man, wouldn&apos;t man pretty much have been in the animal instinct mode?"-First of all, I think it is virtually certain that consciousness arose in the lineage of human beings long before they were recognizably human. Additionally, it was undoubtedly in Neanderthals, who probably arose alongside the human lineage, not as an offshoot of it.-So a more properly phrased question would be: "Before the rise of consciousness (period!), wouldn&apos;t [i]animals[/i] pretty much have been in the animal instinct mode?" Phrased thus properly, you can see that this is just a tautology.-"it seems to me evil would have came about when man became conscious enough to call or name something evil that would have been considered animal instinct before his growth in consciousness."-You&apos;re assuming that consciousness requires verbalization. I think animals can have a sense of right and wrong as well as a sense of beauty without having the ability to formulate grammars for their vocalizations. Various animal calls and "body language" can express moral and aesthetic [i]feelings[/i].-To address the point I think you&apos;re making without all this hair splitting, without a sense of good and evil, the only thing an animal can act on is unreflective instinct, uncolored by any other conscious awareness of "values." But isn&apos;t that true almost by definition?