AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by Frank Paris
Post reply
Reply to the message by
Frank Paris
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> "Some past contributors may, however, have said that God himself created the laws of Nature."-Count me in there. The laws of nature flow out of the fundamentals. God created the fundamentals. It is a mystery however if God knew beforehand that the laws of nature would actually produce life forms. The only thing that is not a mystery is that it is [i]possible[/i] to produce a set of fundamentals that can produce a universe that can evolve conscious organisms. The fundamentals upon which our universe is based obviously can evolve conscious organisms.-'we are here because in order to achieve his purpose he "set up" his particles to create the codes needed to get us here. How, then, can this be construed as life and the codes for evolution coming about "by accident"?'-It is not known whether God set up his particles to create the particular codes need to get us here. All that is known is that the particles he did set up had the potential to produce the particlar codes life on Earth is based on. We don't know whether the particles also have the potential to produce [i]other[/i] codes upon which life could be based. I've said this twenty times. We don't know whether the [i]particular[/i] genetic codes developed on Earth were the result of accident. Also, any evolutionist worth his salt realizes that there were plenty of accidents involved in the emergence of life on our planet, and also that it could not have taken place [i]in the way it has[/i] without the laws of nature having the properties they do have.-"It seems to me that in order to accommodate the vision of an all-loving God, your theology requires just as many intellectual contortions as that of the conventional Creator model."-Why should any adequate description of reality be easy to express? That statement seems more like mud slinging than anything else. Any adequate description of reality will require substantial intellectual efforts to comprehend, especially if it flies in the face of the channels your brain has been programmed to travel through.-"I hope the above will help you to understand why it's so difficult for me to find consistency and coherence in some of your thinking."-All I see is a persistent resistence against coming to grips with what I'm trying to get at, repeating the same difficulties over and over again, regardless of how many attempts I make to put it into different words. This actually doesn't really surprise me. Whenever someone is confronted with statements that fly in the face of his basic assumptions, he's going to have trouble coming to grips with them.-"I also hope such discussions are not too frustrating for you."-Don't worry about it. Just try to remain non-judgemental and open-minded.
OK - Submit
Preview