AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by dhw
Post reply
Reply to the message by
dhw
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> QUOTE: "[i]In conclusion, to generate an adaptational package requires not piecemeal change but integrated, systematic change. Moreover, the source of such change must impart massive amounts of new functional information into an organism. Such information, however, gives no evidence of resulting from the interplay of mutation and selection. Indeed, it gives no evidence of being reducible to matter and energy at all."[/i]-David's comment: [i]These changes are saltations, not available by Darwin's thoughts. The fruit fly mutation experiments show that. God, anyone?[/i]- David's comment (on "kidneys"): [i]We are back to saltation and the recognition that Darwin's ideas don't work. But intelligent design explains it. There is only chance and design to consider, or wish for a third way, for which there is no trace of evidence.[/i]-We have long, long, long ago rejected Darwin's random mutations and gradualism, and even his “bulldog” Huxley complained about his dogmatic refusal to accept the possibility of saltations. More dead-horse-flogging. I agree that the choice is between chance and design, but the intelligent cell hypothesis is not a third way - it is a different form of design from your 3.8-billion-year computer programme and/or dabbling, for which there is no trace of evidence.
OK - Submit
Preview