AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by dhw
Post reply
Reply to the message by
dhw
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> DAVID: [i]From Nature, a battle for relevence of outside ideas about evolution:[/i]-http://www.nature.com/news/does-evolutionary-theory-need-a-rethink-1.16080?WT.ec_id=NAT...-[i]No firm answers for how speciation occurs. Shapiro and his ilk are avoided.[/i]-I was naturally disappointed that there was no mention of the crucial need for more research into what McClintock called “[i]knowledge the cell has of itself, and how it utilizes this knowledge in a ‘thoughtful' manner when challenged[/i].” I suppose “phenotypic plasticity” is the nearest the authors come, but they don't seem to consider its implications. It's as if they had never heard of McClintock, Margulis, or “Shapiro and his ilk”, but otherwise I like the call for a broader approach, and one item particularly caught my attention, as it is directly relevant to our discussions:-“[i]Such legacies can even generate macro-evolutionary patterns. For instance, evidence suggests that sponges oxygenated the ocean and by doing so created opportunities for other organisms to live on the seabed. Accumulating fossil data indicate that inherited modifications of the environment by species has repeatedly facilitated, sometimes after millions of years, the evolution of new species and ecosystems[/i].”-The authors seem to take it for granted that once there are new opportunities, organisms will simply turn themselves into new species. We're not expected to ask how. Random mutations don't fit in, since the link with environmental changes can hardly be called random, but “plasticity” isn't much use unless there's some sort of intelligent mechanism to mould it. However, on the plus side I would interpret the above findings as support for the hypothesis that even the Cambrian can be explained by a change in the environment offering new opportunities for inventive mechanisms to cooperate in producing new forms of life.
OK - Submit
Preview