Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> > rom: Information is stored in a book as well. A switched off computer remembers information too after being switched off.-The book analogy is a non-answer. There is no proof a brain acts like a man-made computer. Alexander&apos;s brain was subjected to a severe form of meningo-encephalitis. Several forms of test showed that his cerebrum was entirely non-fuctional for about a week. It is Alexander&apos;s opinion that it did not function and could not have functioned during the week when the memories of his NDE were recorded. But where was that recording?...not in his cerebrum.- > rom:. Scientists (and doctors) can only study objects after energy has been exchanged between the object and the subject. -Or observe a lack of energy if nothing is received from the cerebrum as in Alexander&apos;s case. -Dennett is as noted as Antony Flew was. So I wonder what his philosophic opinion is worth. Philosophy is all opinion. I prefer the very broad inclusive atheistic philosophic approach of Ed Feser and Raymond Tallis to the obvious bias of Dennett. But that is my opinion.