AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by dhw
Post reply
Reply to the message by
dhw
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> TONY: "[i]there must be overlap and agreement. There must be unity between the various schools of thought, or, by definition, one of them is wrong."[/i]-ROMANSH: [i]I would phrase it slightly differently. If the various schools of thought don't point in the same direction then one, the other or both are inaccurate. Even if they both point in the same direction both could be inaccurate. Having said that if we can't use reason (fallible as it is) to adjudicate the degree of accuracy of different world views, then we have taken a step away from agnosticism to the very bowels of solipsism.[/i]-I'm sure sensible folk like us would agree that reason sets limits on what we ourselves consider credible, but none of us can adjudicate the accuracy of different world views, unless God himself (if he exists) pops in to tell us. We do not have an objective yardstick! But I don't see why this is a step away from agnosticism towards solipsism. We've had this conversation before. So long as there is a consensus among us, we can ignore the absolute scepticism of the solipsists and carry on in what we agree to be a real world. You can't have a world view unless you accept that there is a world to view!
OK - Submit
Preview