AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by romansh
Post reply
Reply to the message by
romansh
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> > I wouldn't call it Eden, but then I don't believe Eden ever existed! > I too am skeptical of a literal interpretaion of the Garden of Eden story. As a metaphor though it is quite interesting. Joseph Campbell explains it nicely.-[i]"That is to say, put yourself back in the position of paradise before you thought in terms of good and evil. You don't hear that much from the pulpits."[/i] Here he is trying to say the old testament is advising us not to think in dualistic terms. -> [b]Knowledge[/b]: "[i]information which is accepted as being true by general consensus among those who are aware of it[/i]." > > [b]Belief[/b]: "[i]information which individuals accept as being true although there is no general consensus on its truth[/i]." > > I see faith simply as a strong belief, often in a religious context, which doesn't require any further definition.-I think it is useful to to agree on definitions. Helps with clarity of discourse. But the question remains have we defined say "knowledge" into existence? And does this remain a thought. I understand this is solipsism gone mad - but this I suspect is at the very core of agnosticism.
OK - Submit
Preview