AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by postbox49
Post reply
Reply to the message by
postbox49
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> 'But who says that different, unsolved (possibly insoluble) problems invalidate a proposition?' - Well it seems to me the main thing Dawkins and co are saying here is that to push back the issue and say there is a designer, isn't an answer! It just replaces one question with another question. What he is saying is this is no argument for the existence of God. If anything the argument is simply the agnostic one that either you cannot know, or that you should go on with studies to investigate the matter further rather than framing a theology around a question. - Unless there is proof of the proposition, what reason would we have to believe it? - I'm not sure what the credentials of the person who wrote this site are? - Personally I like interesting debate - but I'm not sure it is really very productive for non-believers of various sorts or agnostics to sit around pontificating on matters such as the interpretation of Darwin. What is far more important it seems to me is whether you are an agnostic or atheist to discuss, what should our values be in the light of our views, and how will we personally live ethically and how will we seek to influence society for good? - Mike
OK - Submit
Preview