AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by David Turell
Post reply
Reply to the message by
David Turell
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> > DAVID: [i]Physical designs are mental. not phenotypical as in speciation.[/i] > > > > dhw:[i] We are not talking about speciation but about the evolution of the brain. [...] If God exists, he gave us the ability to design our machines, art, institutions etc. He did not preprogramme these into the new cells of 300,000 years ago.[/i] > > > > I then asked why your God could not have given the same autonomy to other cells. > > > > DAVID: [i]God could have, but there is no evidence other types of cells than neurons can act like neurons.[/i] > > > > dhw: Thank you for agreeing that he could have. There is no evidence that your God fiddled with every other type of cell. Your God’s role in evolution – if he exists – is as unknown as his purposes and his nature. All our theories, as you keep telling us, are guesswork. > > At least I stick to reasoning from the available science of His works. > > > > [b]Free will and a free-for-all[/b] > > DAVID: [i]God gave up total control by giving us free will.[/i] > > > > dhw: [i]And that is why it is perfectly possible that (if he exists) he gave up total control by setting in motion a free-for-all, whereby organisms did their own designing[/i]. > > > > Not answered. > > > > DAVID: [i]No need. Previous discussions found no evidence for that theory.[/i] > > > > dhw: Once more: there is no evidence for ANY of our theories, including yours. We can only discuss feasibility. > > Your form of God has feasibility for anything human > > > > DAVID: [i]God used evolution to create us, no matter what the Raup statistics show.[/i] > > > > dhw: If God exists, he used evolution to create every organism that ever lived, whether directly or indirectly. > > Of course. > > > > “[b]De novo” (The Cambrian)[/b] > > > > DAVID: [i]You are stuck with a real gap. Only a designer can explain it.[/i] > > > > dhw: [i]That is your rigid but unproven belief, which requires what you yourself acknowledge to be a leap of faith.[/i] > > > > DAVID:[i] I just added another new Cambrian, making the gap bigger! Whet proof do you need in your wishful blind hope. It is no longer a theory, but a huge gap.[/i] > > > > dhw: [i]Nobody has said that the Cambrian Gap is a theory!!![/i] > > > > DAVID: [i]You did: "dhw: First of all, “de novo” creation in the Cambrian remains a theory." Tuesday, July 23, 2024, 18:15[/i] > > > > dhw: Your Mr Hyde is making a fool of you. The theory is “de novo” creation!!! That is your guesswork solution to the mystery of the Cambrian Gap. > > > > dhw: [i]The Cambrian Gap is a real mystery, and there are theories which try to explain it! We have considered three: the fossil record is bound to be incomplete; cellular intelligence may be sufficiently advanced to make major jumps when conditions allow them; there is an unknown, sourceless mind which designed species “de novo”[/i]. > > > > DAVID: [i]Such new complex organisms with brains, eyes, guts, demand a designer to explain them.[/i] > > > > dhw: You have chosen the third of the three theoretical explanations. > > Yes, there is a gap followed by enormous unexplained complexity. Nothing here is gradual. For more than 160+ years later, now with many deposits of Cambrian animals found all over the world, no new fossils of precursors! Only a designer fits.
OK - Submit
Preview