Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> > [b]God’s imperfect system.[/b]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Your God has no resemblance to mine. You are trying to make my God human. You can't. No double standards. I fully reject yours.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: You tried to explain the imperfection of your God’s method of evolution by telling us that all evolutions require a process of “culling” as shown by human “trial and error”. It was you who equated your God’s method with human methods, and yet you constantly reject my alternative theories because they “humanize” your God. Double standards.
> 
> Any evolutionary process REQUIRES culling.
> > 
> > [b]Biochemical controls (99.9% versus 0.1%).[/b]
> > 
> > dhw: [b][i]Do you believe that we and our food are directly descended from 99.9% of all the creatures that ever lived?[/i][/b]
> > 
> > DAVID: [b][i]No. From 0.1% surviving.[/i][/b]
> > 
> > In case you haven‘t understood yourself, that means that 99.9% of all the creatures that ever lived were NOT the ancestors of the living.
> 
> Nutty. The 99.9% created the 0.1%!!!
> > 
> > [b]Earliest L-forms[/b]
> > 
> > DAVID:[i] it is clear life appeared very early on Earth; despite the fact the early Earth was not really prepared for life to survive. This suggests to me a designer God pushing life development ahead as fast as He could.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: [i]It suggests to me that if there is a designer, he was experimenting, and learning as he went along.[/i]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Yes, a dumb God who doesn't know what He is doing. Downgrading God as usual.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: It is usually you who downgrade God by ridiculing his method of evolution as messy and inefficient. If life kept appearing and disappearing because early Earth was not really ready for it to survive, how does that come to mean that your God was in perfect control of a perfect method? 
> 
> We have discussed the imperfections.
> > 
> > [b]Origin of life[/b]
> 
> > DAVID: [i]God is not inefficient, His evolutionary method appears to be. Quite a difference in interpretation from a so-called balanced agnostic![/i]
> > 
> > dhw: It is YOU who keep ridiculing it as inefficient, because you insist on burdening him with your version of his purpose (us and our contemporaries) and a method which produced and demanded the culling of 99.9% of species that were irrelevant to his purpose. The free-for-all and experimentation theories would both explain the comings and goings without the ridicule. 
> 
> Insistence on a humanized God as usual.
> > 
> > [b]Plant intelligence[/b]
> > 
> > [i]Trewavas accordingly defines plant intelligence as ‘adaptively variable behaviour during the lifetime of the individual’.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: All the arguments in favour of plant intelligence apply to cellular intelligence as well. According to Shapiro: “[i]Living cells and organisms are cognitive (sentient) entities that act and interact purposefully to ensure survival, growth and proliferation[/i].” Clearly his theory is gaining ground.
> > 
> > [b]Origin of life[/b]
> > 
> > QUOTE: "[i]The origins of life remain a major mystery. How were complex molecules able to form and remain intact for prolonged periods without disintegrating?”[/i]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Same old, same old. All of this work starts with preformed molecules off the shelf. It thus completely bypasses the ultimate question how did any biochemical molecules form on a hot rocky planet?[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: Yep, we are all in agreement. The origins of life remain a major mystery.
> 
> That God did it is a reasonable theory.