Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> > DAVID:[i] God chose His perfect system. Only humans criticize as I do. Your same human-God levels problem in understanding.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw:  You have completely ignored the point. According to you, your perfect God’s system is imperfect, in line with human inventions, which evolve [b]via trial and error[/b]. But you criticize my alternatives on the grounds that they “humanize” your God!!! Double standards.
> 
> Your God has no resemblance to mine. You are trying to make my God human. You can't. No double standards. I fully reject yours.
> > 
> > [b]Biochemical controls (99.9% versus 0.1%).[/b]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Same nutty math. All living now are survivors: 0.1%. They are direct descendants of the 99.9% dying in the past. 100%.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: [i]99.9% of creatures who you say were NOT our ancestors plus 0.1% who were our ancestors or who still exist = 100%, as you agreed in bold. Why do you continue to contradict yourself?[/i]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Your math is not 100%: 99.9% extinct ancestors, 0.1% surviving and us 0.1% living= 100.1%.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: [i]Thus is getting sillier and sillier. If we accept Raup’s figures, 99.9% of all species are extinct. These would INCLUDE the extinct ancestors of the current living 0.1%. Our extinct ancestors would have survived earlier extinctions, because otherwise there would have been no direct line between them and us. You quite rightly agreed that these “survivors” would also have been part of “the 0.1% surviving”. 99.9% extinct, including our extinct ancestors, plus 0.1% surviving in the present = 100%. What else could you have meant by your agreement that we are NOT directly descended from the 99.9%? Now look at your next blunder:[/i]
> 
> We are part of the 0.1% surviving. The 99.9% are the ancestors of the living. 100%, simple.
> > 
> > [b]Evolution statistics[/b]
> > QUOTE: [i]Shortly after an asteroid slammed into Earth 66 million years ago, [b]life for non-avian dinosaurs ended[/b], but the evolutionary story for the early ancestors of birds began.[/i]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Redo your evolutionary math: 696 dinosaurs became over 10,000 bird species!!! Raup is an overall view of a whole process. Stop slicing it up.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: Please stop this nonsense. LIFE FOR NON AVIAN DINOSAURS ENDED. Those were the 696 species. Only 4 species of avian dinosaurs evolved into 10,000 bird species.
> 
> And that fits into Raup's totals. Stop slicing out Dinosaurs as if they fit the discussion They do not. One family among many over 3.5+ billion years of evolution.
> 
> > [b]Earliest L-forms[/b]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]it is clear life appeared very early on Earth; despite the fact the early Earth was not really prepared for life to survive. This suggests to me a designer God pushing life development ahead as fast as He could.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: It suggests to me that if there is a designer, he was experimenting, and learning as he went along.
> 
> Yes, a dumb God who doesn't know what He is doing. Downgrading God as usual.
> > 
> > [b]Origin of life[/b]
> > 
> > QUOTE: "[i]In fact, complex life might have arisen several times over the millennia, as has been suggested by other studies. Scientists are still working to pin down which types of life evolved when, and there's no guarantee that all evolutionary jumps would've stuck[/i]”
> > 
> > dhw: Same again: a free-for-all, depending on the environment? Or a possible God possibly experimenting - or being appallingly inefficient, as in David’s theory?
> 
> God is not inefficient, His evolutionary method appears to be. Quite a difference in interpretation from a so-called balanced agnostic!