Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> A reasonable new theory:
> 
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/04/220427100608.htm
> 
> "'We can now independently date eukaryogenesis and key oxygenation transitions in Earth history," said Dr Daniel Mills, of Stanford University.
> 
> "'Based on fossil and biological records, the timing of eukaryogenesis does not correlate with these oxygen transitions in the atmosphere (2.22 billion years ago) or the deep ocean (0.5 billion years ago).
> 
> "'Instead, mitochondria-bearing eukaryotes are consistently dated to between these two oxygenation events, during an interval of deep-sea anoxia and variable surface-water oxygenation."
> 
> "The emergence of mitochondria -- the energy-producing "powerhouses" of eukaryote cells -- is now thought to be the defining step in eukaryogenesis.
> 
> "Mitochondria have different DNA to the cells in which they live, and the new paper addresses the possible origin of this symbiotic relationship, famously championed by the biologist Lynn Margulis.
> 
> "'The 2015 discovery of 'Asgard' archaea (single-celled organisms) offers a major clue," Dr Mills said.
> 
> "'Mitochondria-bearing eukaryotes likely resulted from a merger between archaea and bacteria, and the DNA in modern Asgard archaea is more closely related to the DNA found in eukaryote nuclei today than it is to other archaea.
> 
> "'This is additional evidence that the host that took in the bacterium was an archaeon."
> 
> "Asgard archaea live in anoxic ocean sediments, and they can live symbiotically with bacteria -- possibly the same situation that led to the "metabolic coupling" that created the first eukaryote cells.
> 
> ***
> 
> "'The idea that oxygen led to eukaryogenesis has been taken for granted," he said.
> 
> "'In fact, mitochondrial aerobic respiration probably emerged later, having only become globally widespread within the last billion years as atmospheric oxygen approached modern levels.'"
> 
> Comment: as the evidence comes together, this new theory is reasonable. And puts the first life back in teh deep ocean, not in 'warm ponds'.