AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by David Turell
Post reply
Reply to the message by
David Turell
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> > DAVID: [i]I still have no concept of when God inserted necessary information during the course of evolution. Certainly, the start of life contained enormous amounts, but each new complexity added more.[/i] > > > > dhw: If he didn’t preprogramme it all, he must have kept popping in whenever a new organ, lifestyle, natural wonder etc. was required, i.e. the first bee dance, the first ant bridge, the first weaverbird’s nest, the first flipper, the first absolutely everything, throughout 3.X billion years – and every one of them apparently necessary before he could pop in to design each new hominin and homo before at long last he could combine all the different bits and pieces to fulfil his one and only purpose: H. sapiens (plus food). Meanwhile, what do you think was the purpose of your God giving all these cell communities the ability to interpret if they didn’t need to interpret anything? > > It doesn't matter to me how God did his programming. My conclusion that God designed evolution suffices. My concept of cell intelligence is totally opposite yours. It is entirely automatic as constantly stated. > > > > [b]Ant bridge algorithm[/b] > > > > DAVID: [i]They have built-in interpretation guidelines[/i]. > > > > dhw: [i]Which makes total nonsense of your agreement that they have the ability to interpret![/i] > > > > DAVID: T[i]hey are given the ability to interpret, just the opposite from your thought.[/i] > > > > dhw: The ability to interpret is exactly my thought, since it entails the autonomous, intelligent use of all the abilities listed above, as opposed to bees and ants automatically obeying instructions. > > And I'll stick with automaticity. > > > > [b]Baby bats learn navigation[/b] > > QUOTE:: [i]"The young bats would then make a solo trip from the cave mouth to the nursery tree and begin their exploration of the wider world using that tree as a base. This means the pups somehow learn to navigate to their nursery tree while hanging upside down from their mothers, the researchers conclude.[/i]" > > > > DAVID: [i]more research is needed to see how they learn.[/i] > > > > dhw: [i]May I humbly suggest that they learn by observing and memorizing details of their surroundings, just as human children go out with Mummy and Daddy and eventually know which streets lead to their house, and which house is theirs. What’s your theory? That 3.8 billion years ago God preprogrammed bees and their dance, one species of ant and its bridges, and baby bat navigation – or did he pop in and give them private lessons?[/i] > > > > DAVID: T[i]heir mammalian brains have lots more interpretive ability than bees and ants, obviously.[/i] > > > > dhw: [i]Firstly, “more ability” concedes that bees and ants have the ability, and secondly finding the way home apparently demands more interpretive ability that finding particular flowers in different locations at different distances as well as finding the way home![/i] > > > > DAVID: [i]Finding home needs some basic memory, nothing more. The bee has forward directions of direction, distance from the waggle. Memory of landmarks on the way brings them back. I'll grant basic memory supported by understanding initial information.[/i] > > > > dhw: You have just told us that the bat’s mammalian brain has more interpretive ability because it can find its way home. The bee does far more than just find its way home! This suggests enhanced interpretive ability, i.e. enhanced intelligence. > > Just an enhanced algorithm, nothing more per the article and book.
OK - Submit
Preview