Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> > DAVID: [i]I'll use a simple explanation, seeing patterns in clouds, Mickey Mouse, England/Scotland Island is the brain trying to help you, based on stored memories of patterns.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: [i]You are talking about the process of perception, in which we form “Gestalten”. This has nothing whatsoever to do with her claim that “in every moment the brain takes guesses about what will happen in the next moment”.[/i]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Yes it does. The brain does this in more than perception. Libet's results are another example.[/i]
> > 
> > Please tell me how my attempts to work out how evolution works, or why I forgot to buy my stir fry, entail “[b]a guess about what will happen in the next moment[/b]”. 
> > 
> > dhw: [i]I’d have liked to know your own opinion on her view that EVERY mental experience has a physical cause, and whether you agree with my view of mental illness. Instead, you switched the subject to free will, which she doesn’t even touch on.[/i]
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]I didn't need to reply as I agree with your thought. She is pure materialist.[/i] 
> > And: 
> > [i]Her whole approach is instructive, no more; she is an unadulterated materialist.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: Thank you. I found the second half of the article far from instructive, and indeed very confusing, not to say misleading (and in the context, I thought dualism and materialism were in fact irrelevant). Since currently you and I are the only contributors to the forum, and disagree on so many of our topics, it is doubly important for me to know your views – especially since in this case the author was dealing with medical matters on which you are our resident expert. :-)
> 
> The main ns only point of the article for me is most brain studies are limited to areas and miss the point that the whole brain is always at work, so in a way thestudies are distorted in the impressions they present.