Post reply

Reply to the message by dhw

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> dhw: [i]1) if God’s ONLY PURPOSE was to create H. sapiens and his food supply, why would he have chosen to directly design millions of life forms and food supplies which died out long before the first humans came on the scene [b]and which had no connection with humans[/b]? 2) How could millions of life forms and food supplies that had no connection with humans have been “[b]part of the goal of evolving humans?[/b]” […]
> [b]I suggest that you stick with your occasional response: namely, you have no idea why he would have chosen the theoretical means of fulfilling the theoretical purpose bolded at the start of this post. We could leave it at that.[/b][/i]
> 
> DAVID: [i]I can't answer them because I find your reasoning behind the points totally illogical from my point of view. You refuse to accept the answers I have given which shows how restricted your view is.[/i]
> DAVID: [i]You are correct. I have no idea why He uses that method.[/i]
> dhw: [i]Thank you. That is the acknowledgement I asked for. I suggest we leave it at that.[/i]
> DAVID: [i]Fine[/i]
> dhw: :-)  
> 
> DAVID: [i]And I've answered. History tells us God chose to evolve us.[/i]
> DAVID: [i]You are correct. I have no idea why He uses that method.[/i]
> dhw: [i]Thank you. That is the acknowledgement I asked for. I suggest we leave it at that.[/i]
> DAVID:[i] Fine[/i]
> dhw: :-)
> 
> 
> DAVID: [i]Same distortion. You accept evolution and then state God should not have followed the course of action in evolution, directly implying He should simply have created us without all the beginning organisms.[/i]
> DAVID: [i]You are correct. I have no idea why He uses that method.[/i]
> dhw: [i]Thank you. That is the acknowledgement I asked for. I suggest we leave it at that.[/i]
> DAVID: [i]Fine[/i]
> dhw: :-)