Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> > DAVID: [i]You agree Adler's approach is logical. Thanks. Your incongruities are your illogicality, not mine.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: [i]You force me to repeat the list of your incongruities:[/i]
> > [i]But you have repeatedly admitted that Adler does NOT argue that [b]H. sapiens was your always-in-total-control God’s intent from the beginning,[/b] that [b]for some unknown reason he decided not to fulfil that intent for 3.X billion years and therefore had to preprogramme or dabble every single innovation, lifestyle and natural wonder in life’s history as interim goals in order to cover the time before starting on the fulfilment of his one and only goal[/b]. And I doubt very much that Adler would tell us [b]this theory is perfectly logical provided we do not try to apply human logic, and that any alternative to this theory must be wrong because it entails “humanizing” God, although God “very well could think like us[/b]”[/i].
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]Same old problem. I simply think God is in charge and chose to evolve humans over time. Nothing incongruous about that.[/i]
> > As usual, you leave out approximately half the items in the above list. (See also below.) Your other replies repeat the same diluted version of your theory:
> > 
> > DAVID: [i]If God is in charge He chose to evolve humans. That is what happened [/i]
> > DAVID: [i]God in charge chose to evolve. Perfectly simple. What you do is keep complaining about a God who isn't impatient and should immediately reach His goal. How do you know He should? We will go round and round with no end.[/i]
> > 
> > dhw: You have left out your belief that the creation of H. sapiens was his one and only goal, that he decided not to pursue that goal for 3.X billion years and therefore “had to” specially design every non-human branch of the bush of life to keep life going, and that although you have no idea why he would have done so, it is logical provided we abandon human logic, and any other explanation of the bush and of his purpose can be dismissed as humanization, although it is possible that he does think like us.
> 
> My beliefs remain the  same.