AgnosticWeb.com
Log in
Register
Search:
Back to the entry by Cary Cook
Post reply
Reply to the message by
Cary Cook
Name:
E-mail:
(optional, won't be displayed directly)
Leave this field empty:
Homepage:
(optional)
Leave this field empty:
Location:
(optional)
Remember me (cookie)
Category:
Introduction
The atheist delusion
Agnosticism
Evolution
The limitations of science
Origins
The nature of a 'Creator'
Where is it now?
Endings
Identity
Animals
Humans
Religion
Art
Politics
What should be taught in schools?
A mad world
General
Subject:
Formatting help
skip to input
format text bold
[b]bold text[/b]
format text italic
[i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink
[link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color
[color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size
[size=small]small text[/size]
[size=large]large text[/size]
insert list
[list][*]list item[/list]
insert image
[img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]
:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(
Message:
> Then your location within my definitions would depend on how God is defined. Here are [i]some [/i]possibilities: - 1. The Supreme Being (that which created the first created thing) 2. The Creator of this universe. 3. The Guy in charge of this universe. 4. The Creator of mankind. 5. The Guy to whom mankind is accountable. 6. Any of several versions of a Being described in a body of literature regarded as Scripture - Of course anyone can assert that any combination of the above are all one Guy, but that can't be proven or disproven. - I would guess that you, as the kind of panentheist you describe, would fit into the above definitions as follows: 1. theist 2. theist 3. agnostic 4. theist 5. agnostic 6. agnostic - How'd I do?
OK - Submit
Preview