Post reply

Reply to the message by David Turell

Name:

E-mail: (optional, won't be displayed directly)

Leave this field empty:

Homepage: (optional)

Leave this field empty:

Location: (optional)

Remember me (cookie)

Category:

Subject:

Formatting help

skip to input

format text bold: [b]bold text[/b]
format text italic: [i]italic text[/i]
insert hyperlink: [link=http://example.com/]link text[/link] / [link]http://example.com/[/link]
set text color: [color=#rgb]colored text[/color]
font size: [size=small]small text[/size]; [size=large]large text[/size]
insert list: [list][*]list item[/list]
insert image: [img]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; left: [img=left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; right: [img=right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail: [img=thumbnail]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail left: [img=thumbnail-left]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]; thumbnail right: [img=thumbnail-right]http://example.com/image.jpg[/img]

:-)
;-)
:-P
:-D
:-|
:-(

Message:

> LIGO is preparing a response:
> 
> https://www.newscientist.com/article/2184360-ligo-to-publish-new-paper-in-wake-of-new-scientist-investigation/
> 
> "The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, which detected gravitational waves in 2015, has announced that it will publish a detailed explanation of how it analyses the noise in its detectors.
> 
> "The announcement, on 1 November, comes in the wake of an exclusive New Scientist investigation that exposed questions about the analysis underpinning the breakthrough discovery.
> 
> ***
> 
> "But detecting gravitational waves is hugely challenging. LIGO’s detectors aim to measure a shortening of space equivalent to about a thousandth of the width of a proton. This sort of measurement is swamped by natural thermal vibrations, known as noise, that make picking out the signal from a gravitational wave tricky. To deal with this, the collaboration used sophisticated analysis techniques to remove this noise their data, but these analysis techniques are being questioned.
> 
> "The claims were first aired by a group of Danish researchers a few years ago. Since then, they have published their doubts in a peer reviewed journal. The LIGO collaboration has not yet published any papers clarifying their approach in response.
> 
> "That much was common knowledge in the physics community. But the New Scientist investigation uncovered a number of irregularities, including a published data plot drawn “by eye” rather than with real data.
> 
> "LIGO now says they are in the process of preparing their paper, which will provide more information about their analysis techniques, but has not stated when this is likely to be published."
> 
> Comment: We shall keep following the issue. Everyone is sure gravitational waves exist, but that is not proof.